U.S. WORKERS SPLIT ON ELIMINATION OF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS
New Eagle Hill Research Provides Employee Views, Suggests Questions Employers Must Ask When Considering Changes to Reviews
Webinar on Thursday, January 14th to Review Findings
Arlington, Va., December 15, 2015 – As corporations begin to trend away from annual performance reviews, new research finds that U.S. workers are divided as to whether to save or scrap the system. Only half of U.S. workers polled for Eagle Hill Consulting’s national survey believe it is a good idea to eliminate the formal system. Some 54 percent of those polled said they were pleased with their last performance review, and 65 percent believe their last review was an accurate reflection of their performance.
The findings are detailed in a new Eagle Hill whitepaper, The Annual Performance Review: Old-School or Timeless Tool?. The research is based on a recent poll of 1600 professionals across a range of industries and careers. Eagle Hill’s analysis offers five key questions a company should ask when considering changes to its performance review process.
A webinar is scheduled for Thursday, January 14, 2016, at 11 AM ET to review the findings and respond to questions. Register here.
Melissa Jezior, president and chief executive officer of Eagle Hill said, “Companies should look closely at these findings as they consider whether to refine or replace their performance management system.”
She says it’s trendy for companies to move away from the formal annual review process to help save time and money while increasing performance. “But, the annual performance system has to be replaced with something – and that something probably would take the form of formal and informal feedback sessions. This is problematic for companies that lack an open and regular feedback culture,” Jezior explained.
Only about half of respondents say they currently receive regular feedback from supervisors on their performance.
“Our research sheds light on why employees are wary to move away from annual performance reviews,” Jezior says. “Generally, employees feel the system works, and perhaps may worry they won’t get feedback needed for career growth or they will not have input on salaries and bonuses.”
She says that companies should proceed with caution and solicit employee input before overhauling the system. “It’s critically important to engage employees in any change, be crystal clear about how a new system would work and the impact on promotions and compensation,” Jezior says.
Based on the findings, Eagle Hill developed the following five self-analysis questions employers should ask when considering a performance plan overhaul. Eagle Hill’s related poll findings follow each question.
- How does your organization use performance reviews? According to the poll, employees say the most common uses are to benchmark accomplishments over the past year (78 percent), make sure managers and employees are on the same track in terms of goals and priorities (77%), and to set goals for the following year (70 percent). Fewer employees said that reviews are used to document their performance as it relates to their next promotion (49 percent) or to provide a set of actionable career development activities (62 percent).
- How do your employees feel about your existing performance review process? A majority of respondents (54 percent) were pleased with their last performance review and only small percentages felt de-motivated (10 percent), surprised (6 percent) or angry (5 percent). Only 27 percent said they were motivated by the feedback they received.
- Does your organization have a culture of providing feedback? Only half of respondents said they currently receive regular feedback from supervisors on their Similarly, 49 percent agreed that it would be a good idea to replace annual performance reviews with a system of regularized feedback.
- How does the size of your organization impact performance management preferences? Employees of large or very large organizations were almost twice as likely as those who work for small- to mid-size firms to prefer feedback.
- Is compensation linked to performance reviews, and should it be? Some 65 percent say their last performance review was an accurate reflection of their performance. But, 43 percent of respondents say they are not confident that salaries and/or bonuses can be fairly determined without a formal annual review.
Eagle Hill Consulting LLC is a woman-owned business that provides management consulting services in the areas of business strategy, organizational transformation, human capital transformation, process improvement, program management, and change management. Eagle Hill works with a range of public, private, and non-profit organizations in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and across the nation. A recognized leader, Eagle Hill has earned awards from The Washington Post, Washingtonian, Consulting and Vault as a top workplace. More information is available at www.eaglehillconsulting.com.